Membership Guidelines

WHATEVER LEVEL you're on, is loaded with information to help make you a better sports bettor. On this site, you can access information in one of three ways:

FREE!: Online columns, news and professional analyses by Bobby Smith. You'll learn all the angles and get original insights, angles and opinions.
Registered User: Team Logs for instant, at-a-glance historical data.
Member: Sports Reporter or Sports Reporter Online. Game preview coverage, official Sports Reporter picks, and more.

NFL | College Football (NCAA) | NBA | College Basketball (NCAA)


Sports Reporter

Total game coverage: Every game, as many as 60 per week, receives a predicted winner, final margin and written analyses All with the point-spread in mind.

Top Picks Highlighted: Best Bets and Recommended selections are called out for your benefit. You'll always know who Sports Reporter likes the most.

NBA Past Performances: Key info from the most recent meetings involving the match-ups on tap.

Sports Reporter Online
All the features of Sports Reporter above, plus these added advantages:

Earlier delivery: When you access Sports Reporter through the Web, there is NO CHANCE of missing out on a pick due to late mail delivery.

Midweek Update: As game-day draws nearer, the focus gets clearer. Two or three NBA opportunities will materialize each week as a result of late-breaking developments. You'll get 'em!

College Football (NCAA) | NBA | College Basketball (NCAA)

Login ID
Click for instant
sample issues!


sports betting info
horse racing picks

NFL & CF Stats

by Bobby Smith
Sports Reporter Editor

Power Ratings Rule
NOVEMBER, 2018 -- When last week’s updated College Football Playoff rankings were released, I was curious how they’d compare with a well-crafted set of College Football power ratings (which, as you know, are the foundation for pointspreads, and contain all math, no human judgment or manipulation). The ones I used were the publicly available ratings at The CFP Rankings do not include polls. They are made by people on a selection committee, which allegedly makes evaluations based on the ol’ tried-and-true “numerous factors that we look at.” Whatever. I would have figured that they base it on how much they are paid off the books by ESPN, but what do I know? Two months out, I’m not interested in who will be in the College Football Playoff. When they get to that point, let me know who’s playing who, and what the Line and Total are. Then, I’ll care. But at least the CFP rankings are not comprised by Associated Press and Coaches Polls, allegedly. When the former system, the BCS, was ruling college football post-season protocol, those things were used to come up with rankings. Ugh. Having a 13-person committee of clowns is probably preferable than basing a post-season system on the votes made by 65 broadcasting and sportswriting trivia turkeys who cover a sport they don’t understand, and whose judgment is distracted by their obsession with “this team, just beat a ranked opponent, in November, for the first time… since 2016!.” The fewer dopes with that kind of perspective, the better, right? It’s also probably better than anything that can be cooked up by the 130 borderline psychotics coaching FBS-level football programs. But enough of my sarcastic critique of a tiresome tradition. MORE

    Home | Contact Us | Membership | About Us | Legal | Sign-up
NFL | NBA | NCAA Football | NCAA Basketball | Daily Picks