WHATEVER LEVEL you're on, sportsreporter.com is loaded with
information to help make you a better sports bettor. On this
site, you can access information in one of three ways:
FREE!: Online columns, news and professional
analyses by Bobby Smith. You'll learn all the angles and get
original insights, angles and opinions.
Registered User: Team Logs for instant, at-a-glance
Member: Sports Reporter or Sports Reporter
Online. Game preview coverage, official Sports Reporter picks,
NFL | College
Football (NCAA) | NBA
| College Basketball
College Basketball (NCAA)
Total game coverage: Forecasted margins for
every game on the Las Vegas board. Written analyses for 55 games
Top Picks Highlighted: Best Bets and Recommended
selections are called out for your benefit. You'll always
know who Sports Reporter likes the most.
Power Ratings: Compare Vegas lines with
our solid set of numbers. Every board team is included, even
the "added" conferences!
Sports Reporter Online
All the features of Sports Reporter above, plus these added
Earlier delivery: When you access Sports
Reporter through the Web, there is NO CHANCE of missing out
on a pick due to late mail delivery.
College Scoops!: It's Midweek Update with
MORE! Extra coverage not found in the weekly Sports Reporter
issue. Events happen post-publication. Our guys find out.
They report it. You capitalize on it! Up to 15 more college
basketball games receive written analyses each week, with
three- to five more official selections!
College Football (NCAA)
| NBA | College
|by Bobby Smith
Sports Reporter Editor
Power Ratings Rule
NOVEMBER, 2018 -- When last weekâ€™s updated College Football Playoff rankings were released, I was curious how theyâ€™d compare with a well-crafted set of College Football power ratings (which, as you know, are the foundation for pointspreads, and contain all math, no human judgment or manipulation). The ones I used were the publicly available ratings at Sagarin.com. The CFP Rankings do not include polls. They are made by people on a selection committee, which allegedly makes evaluations based on the olâ€™ tried-and-true â€śnumerous factors that we look at.â€ť Whatever. I would have figured that they base it on how much they are paid off the books by ESPN, but what do I know? Two months out, Iâ€™m not interested in who will be in the College Football Playoff. When they get to that point, let me know whoâ€™s playing who, and what the Line and Total are. Then, Iâ€™ll care. But at least the CFP rankings are not comprised by Associated Press and Coaches Polls, allegedly. When the former system, the BCS, was ruling college football post-season protocol, those things were used to come up with rankings. Ugh. Having a 13-person committee of clowns is probably preferable than basing a post-season system on the votes made by 65 broadcasting and sportswriting trivia turkeys who cover a sport they donâ€™t understand, and whose judgment is distracted by their obsession with â€śthis team, just beat a ranked opponent, in November, for the first timeâ€¦ since 2016!.â€ť The fewer dopes with that kind of perspective, the better, right? Itâ€™s also probably better than anything that can be cooked up by the 130 borderline psychotics coaching FBS-level football programs. But enough of my sarcastic critique of a tiresome tradition. MORE